TYPES QUESTIONS USED BY 8TH GRADE ENGLISH TEACHERS IN ENGLISH CLASSROOM INTERACTION IN INDONESIA

  • Yuniarto Linggo Pramono Universitas Lambung Mangkurat
  • Rina Listia Universitas Lambung Mangkurat
  • Rizky Amalia Politeknik Negeri Banjarmasin
Keywords: Lesson plan, curriculum, English teachers, lesson plan components

Abstract

Questions are essential for teachers as a tool to communicate and evaluate their students’ comprehension in the classroom. The research was conducted to check and asses the most questions used, cognitive questions based on Bloom’s Taxonomy criteria and the implementation of questions. To check the frequency of questions, the researcher used checklist from some experts and Bloom’s Taxonomy. Therefore, the researcher employed descriptive qualitative study and the subjects of the research was two 8th grade English teachers of SMPN 1 Banjarmasin. Research data was collected from observing the English interaction in the classroom. The findings of the research showed that display questions dominated from all of the questions used. The implementation of cognitive questions in the classrooms also did not fulfill the requirements to be in cognitive questions based Bloom’s Taxonomy. By all means, teacher can collaborate with other teachers and prepare the questions as long as it fits the characteristics of the students.

References

Fatimah, N. (2014). Pre-Service teachers’ questioning Skill: A Case Study On Pre-Service Teachers of English Teacher Education Department, Faculty of Education and Teacher Training Sunan Ampel State Islamic University Surabaya, Academic Year 2013/2014 (Doctoral dissertation, UIN Sunan Ampel Surabaya).

Hamiloğlu, A. P. D. K., TURKEY, G. K. K. İ., Temiz, G., & TURKEY, İ. (2012) The Impact of Teacher Questions On Student Learning in EFL. Journal of Educational and Instructional Studies, 2.

Huitt, W. (2011). Bloom et al.'s taxonomy of the cognitive domain. Educational Psychology Interactive. Valdosta, GA.

Jumadi, Daud P, Fatchul M, Cayandrawati S, and Sirajuddin K. (Ed.). (2011). Pedoman Penulisan Skripsi (Sarjana’s Thesis). Banjarmasin: English Department FKIP ULM Universitas Lambung Mangkurat.

Krathwohl, D. R. (2002). A revision of Bloom's taxonomy: An overview. Theory into practice, 41(4), 212-218.

Kyriacou, C. (2007). Essential Teaching Skill (Third Edition). United Kingdom: Nelson Thomes Ltd.

Ma, X. (2008). The Skills of Teacher's Questioning in English Classes. International Education Studies, 1(4), 92-100.

MUIN, F. (2017). Phonemic interference of local language in spoken english by students of english Department of Lambung Mangkurat University. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 8(1).

Mayer, R. E. (2002). Rote versus meaningful learning. Theory into practice, 41(4), 226-232.

ÇAKMAK, M. (2009). Pre-service teachers’ thoughts about teachers’ questions in effective teaching process. İlköğretim Online, 8(3), 666-675.

Muhson, A. (2004). Meningkatkan Profesionalisme Guru: Sebuah Harapan. Jurnal Ekonomi dan Pendidikan, 1(2). 90-98.

Qashoa, S. H. (2013). Effects of teacher question types and syntactic structures on EFL classroom interaction. The International Journal of Social Sciences, 7(1), 52-62.

Ronsyn, K. M. (2013). Exploring The Relationship of Associate Teachers and Teacher Candidates Within the Teaching Practicum. 52.

Shomoossi, N. (2004). The effect of teachers’ questioning behavior on EFL Classroom interaction: A classroom research study. The Reading Matrix, 4(2). 97-98

Soge, Sophia Anggita K. (2017). Thesis. Types of Teacher’s Questions and Questioning Strategies at Elementery 1 Level of ELTI. Yogyakarta: Sanata Dharma University.

Soge, S. A. K. (2017). Types of Teacher’s Questions and Questioning Strategies at Elementary 1 Level of ELTI (Doctoral dissertation, SANATA DHARMA UNIVERSITY).

Brown, G. A., & Wragg, E. C. (2003). Questioning in the secondary school. Routledge.

Published
2024-06-28
How to Cite
Pramono, Y., Listia, R., & Amalia, R. (2024). TYPES QUESTIONS USED BY 8TH GRADE ENGLISH TEACHERS IN ENGLISH CLASSROOM INTERACTION IN INDONESIA. LINGUA EDUCATIA, 6(2), 54-61. https://doi.org/10.20527/lej.v6i1.2983